EditThisPic vs Pixlr for Quick Edits
Both are fast online editors. But AI prompts beat clicking through menus. Here's why.
The Verdict
Pixlr is a capable free online editor with Photoshop-like tools and AI features. EditThisPic skips the tools entirely β describe your edit in plain English and AI does it. For quick edits, EditThisPic is faster because there's no tool selection, no parameter adjustments, just results. Pixlr is better when you want manual control over specific adjustments.
| Feature | EditThisPic | Pixlr |
|---|---|---|
| Speed to Result | Seconds (one prompt) | Minutes (select tool, adjust) |
| Background Removal | Yes, one prompt | Yes, AI-powered |
| Object Removal | Describe what to remove | AI cutout + healing |
| Manual Adjustments | AI handles everything | Full slider controls |
| Layers | No | Yes, Photoshop-like |
| Free Tier | 1 free edit/week | Free with ads |
| Photo Restoration | Yes | No |
| Text-to-Edit | Yes, any edit | No |
Speed Through Simplicity
Quick edits should be quick. In Pixlr, you open the editor, find the right tool, adjust settings, apply. In EditThisPic, you type what you want: 'brighten this photo and remove the car in the background.' Done.
Pixlr's Manual Control
When you need precise manual adjustments β specific brightness levels, exact crop dimensions, layer compositing β Pixlr's Photoshop-like interface is valuable. Not every edit needs AI.
Complex Edits Made Quick
Tasks that take multiple steps in Pixlr (select, mask, fill, blend) are one sentence in EditThisPic. 'Remove the person behind me and fix the lighting' β done in one step.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
View all comparisons →The Quickest Quick Edit
Describe your edit. Get results in seconds. No tools to learn.
Try It Free